Monthly Poster Statistics for January 2011 in funto.

These statistics are based on posts supplied to me by Eternal September's servers.
Some posts may have been missed.

Author spammers represents all the spammers posting to the group.
[X] indicates posters who only contributed to cross-posted threads, almost certainly regulars in the one of other groups x-posted to.

* Lpp = Lines per post; % = percentage of total posts due to this author; cum% = percentage of total posts due to all authors above and including this author*

Posters sorted … by posts made Posts Lines bytes Lpp* % * Author Rank Cum.% Posts Lines bytes Lpp* % * Author Rank Cum.% 10 156 17183 15.6 23.81 Ponder 1 23.81 9 186 12540 20.7 21.43 kat 2 45.24 9 171 15271 19.0 21.43 Pam the goose 2 66.67 5 65 6986 13.0 11.90 Patrick 4 78.57 3 83 6233 27.7 7.14 GbH 5 85.71 2 46 3199 23.0 4.76 Ali 6 90.48 1 012 01496 12.0 2.38 Indy Jess John 7 92.86 1 014 01680 14.0 2.38 Pandamonium 7 95.24 1 006 01086 6.0 2.38 Gander 7 97.62 1 020 01610 20.0 2.38 Oliver 7 100.00

… by threads started Threads Author Rank Threads Author Rank 2 Ponder 1 1 Patrick 2 1 Gander 2 1 Ali 2 1 Pam the goose 2 0 Indy Jess John 6 0 Pandamonium 6 0 kat 6 0 Oliver 6 0 GbH 6

Number of posters having few posts. Posts Posters 1 4 2 1 3 1 4 0 5 1 6 0 7 0 8 0 9 2 10+ 1

Top 10 verbose posters by average lines per post lines/post Author rank 27.7 GbH 1 23.0 Ali 2 20.7 kat 3 20.0 Oliver 4 19.0 Pam the goose 5 15.6 Ponder 6 14.0 Pandamonium 7 13.0 Patrick 8 12.0 Indy Jess John 9 6.0 Gander 10

Top 10 concise posters by average lines per post lines/post Author rank 6.0 Gander 10

High lines/post may be because the posters have something to say, have used blank lines for legibility, or because they don't snip

Low lines/post may be because the posters have nothing to say, have dense text, or because they over snip