Monthly Poster Statistics for January 2016 in funto.

These statistics are based on posts supplied to me by Eternal September's servers.
Some posts may have been missed.

Author spammers represents all the spammers posting to the group.
[X] indicates posters who only contributed to cross-posted threads, almost certainly regulars in the one of other groups x-posted to.

Author Gmailer represents otherwise unknown persons posting through Google Groups

* Lpp = Lines per post; PpD= average Posts per Day; % = percentage of total posts due to this author; cum% = cumulative percentage of total posts due to all authors above and including this author*

Posters sorted … by posts made Posts Lines bytes Lpp* PpD* % * Author Rank Cum.% Posts Lines bytes Lpp* PpD* % * Author Rank Cum.% 8 152 12950 19.0 0.26 22.22 kat 1 22.22 6 120 10550 20.0 0.19 16.67 Ali 2 38.89 5 56 8014 11.2 0.16 13.89 Indy Jess John 3 52.78 5 70 9103 14.0 0.16 13.89 Pam the goose 3 66.67 4 44 5905 11.0 0.13 11.11 Oliver 5 77.78 3 55 4336 18.3 0.10 8.33 Stanley Daniel De Liver 6 86.11 2 3 2045 1.5 0.06 5.56 Patrick 7 91.67 2 25 3171 12.5 0.06 5.56 Ponder 7 97.22 1 013 01429 13.0 0.03 2.78 Gander 9 100.00

… by threads started Threads Author Rank Threads Author Rank 2 Ali 1 2 Patrick 1 1 kat 3 1 Oliver 3 1 Ponder 3 0 Indy Jess John 6 0 Pam the goose 6 0 Gander 6 0 Stanley Daniel De Liver 6

Number of posters having few posts. Posts Posters 1 1 2 2 3 1 4 1 5 2 6 1 7 0 8 1 9 0 10+ 0

Top 10 verbose posters (over 0 posts) by average lines per post lines/post Author rank 20.0 Ali 1 19.0 kat 2 18.3 Stanley Daniel De Liver 3 14.0 Pam the goose 4 13.0 Gander 5 12.5 Ponder 6 11.2 Indy Jess John 7 11.0 Oliver 8 1.5 Patrick 9

High lines/post may be because the posters have something to say, have used blank lines for legibility, or because they don't snip

Low lines/post may be because the posters have nothing to say, have dense text, or because they over snip