Monthly Poster Statistics for January 2017 in funto.

These statistics are based on posts supplied to me by Eternal September's servers.
Some posts may have been missed.

Author spammers represents all the spammers posting to the group.
[X] indicates posters who only contributed to cross-posted threads, almost certainly regulars in the one of other groups x-posted to.

Author Gmailer represents otherwise unknown persons posting through Google Groups

* Lpp = Lines per post; PpD= average Posts per Day; % = percentage of total posts due to this author; cum% = cumulative percentage of total posts due to all authors above and including this author*

Posters sorted … by posts made Posts Lines bytes Lpp* PpD* % * Author Rank Cum.% Posts Lines bytes Lpp* PpD* % * Author Rank Cum.% 5 94 9331 18.8 0.16 20.00 Ali 1 20.00 5 73 8645 14.6 0.16 20.00 Pam the goose 1 40.00 4 52 6054 13.0 0.13 16.00 Ponder 3 56.00 3 42 4913 14.0 0.10 12.00 Kerr Mudd-John 4 68.00 2 38 4330 19.0 0.06 8.00 Indy Jess John 5 76.00 2 33 2649 16.5 0.06 8.00 Gander 5 84.00 2 65 5917 32.5 0.06 8.00 HVS 5 92.00 1 021 01773 21.0 0.03 4.00 Frogman 8 96.00 1 005 01372 5.0 0.03 4.00 Oliver 8 100.00

… by threads started Threads Author Rank Threads Author Rank 1 Gander 1 1 Ponder 1 1 Ali 1 0 Indy Jess John 4 0 Frogman 4 0 Kerr Mudd-John 4 0 Oliver 4 0 Pam the goose 4 0 HVS 4

Number of posters having few posts. Posts Posters 1 2 2 3 3 1 4 1 5 2 6 0 7 0 8 0 9 0 10+ 0

Top 10 verbose posters (over 0 posts) by average lines per post lines/post Author rank 32.5 HVS 1 21.0 Frogman 2 19.0 Indy Jess John 3 18.8 Ali 4 16.5 Gander 5 14.6 Pam the goose 6 14.0 Kerr Mudd-John 7 13.0 Ponder 8 5.0 Oliver 9

High lines/post may be because the posters have something to say, have used blank lines for legibility, or because they don't snip

Low lines/post may be because the posters have nothing to say, have dense text, or because they over snip