Monthly Poster Statistics for January 2014 in funto.

These statistics are based on posts supplied to me by Eternal September's servers.
Some posts may have been missed.

Author spammers represents all the spammers posting to the group.
[X] indicates posters who only contributed to cross-posted threads, almost certainly regulars in the one of other groups x-posted to.

* Lpp = Lines per post; PpD= average Posts per Day; % = percentage of total posts due to this author; cum% = cumulative percentage of total posts due to all authors above and including this author*

Posters sorted … by posts made Posts Lines bytes Lpp* PpD* % * Author Rank Cum.% Posts Lines bytes Lpp* PpD* % * Author Rank Cum.% 49 859 102133 17.5 1.58 29.88 Pam the goose 1 29.88 38 997 76396 26.2 1.23 23.17 Stanley Daniel De Liver 2 53.05 32 447 57432 14.0 1.03 19.51 Oliver 3 72.56 18 261 34284 14.5 0.58 10.98 Indy Jess John 4 83.54 16 508 35775 31.8 0.52 9.76 kat 5 93.29 10 173 18379 17.3 0.32 6.10 Ali 6 99.39 1 008 01458 8.0 0.03 0.61 Gander 7 100.00

… by threads started Threads Author Rank Threads Author Rank 4 Oliver 1 2 Ali 2 1 Indy Jess John 3 1 Pam the goose 3 1 kat 3 0 Gander 6 0 Stanley Daniel De Liver 6

Number of posters having few posts. Posts Posters 1 1 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 0 8 0 9 0 10+ 6

Top 10 verbose posters (over 0 posts) by average lines per post lines/post Author rank 31.8 kat 1 26.2 Stanley Daniel De Liver 2 17.5 Pam the goose 3 17.3 Ali 4 14.5 Indy Jess John 5 14.0 Oliver 6 8.0 Gander 7

Top 10 concise posters (over 0 posts) by average lines per post lines/post Author rank

High lines/post may be because the posters have something to say, have used blank lines for legibility, or because they don't snip

Low lines/post may be because the posters have nothing to say, have dense text, or because they over snip