Monthly Poster Statistics for February 2014 in funto.

These statistics are based on posts supplied to me by Eternal September's servers.
Some posts may have been missed.

Author spammers represents all the spammers posting to the group.
[X] indicates posters who only contributed to cross-posted threads, almost certainly regulars in the one of other groups x-posted to.

* Lpp = Lines per post; PpD= average Posts per Day; % = percentage of total posts due to this author; cum% = cumulative percentage of total posts due to all authors above and including this author*

Posters sorted … by posts made Posts Lines bytes Lpp* PpD* % * Author Rank Cum.% Posts Lines bytes Lpp* PpD* % * Author Rank Cum.% 26 413 49435 15.9 0.93 26.53 Pam the goose 1 26.53 26 729 51533 28.0 0.93 26.53 Stanley Daniel De Liver 1 53.06 15 245 24264 16.3 0.54 15.31 Ali 3 68.37 15 261 29389 17.4 0.54 15.31 Indy Jess John 3 83.67 13 149 19404 11.5 0.46 13.27 Oliver 5 96.94 1 011 01911 11.0 0.04 1.02 Frogman 6 97.96 1 021 01500 21.0 0.04 1.02 kat 6 98.98 1 019 01719 19.0 0.04 1.02 Richard Colton 6 100.00

… by threads started Threads Author Rank Threads Author Rank 2 Indy Jess John 1 1 Ali 2 0 Frogman 3 0 Pam the goose 3 0 kat 3 0 Richard Colton 3 0 Stanley Daniel De Liver 3 0 Oliver 3

Number of posters having few posts. Posts Posters 1 3 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 0 8 0 9 0 10+ 5

Top 10 verbose posters (over 0 posts) by average lines per post lines/post Author rank 28.0 Stanley Daniel De Liver 1 21.0 kat 2 19.0 Richard Colton 3 17.4 Indy Jess John 4 16.3 Ali 5 15.9 Pam the goose 6 11.5 Oliver 7 11.0 Frogman 8

Top 10 concise posters (over 0 posts) by average lines per post lines/post Author rank

High lines/post may be because the posters have something to say, have used blank lines for legibility, or because they don't snip

Low lines/post may be because the posters have nothing to say, have dense text, or because they over snip